Skip to main content
x
Close

MIPPA Accreditation for Advanced Imaging Services

Ken Repking, BS, CNMT, NMTCB(RS)

CMS-Approved Accreditation

Effective January 1, 2012, The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) enacted measures to improve the safety, quality, and oversight of advanced diagnostic imaging services. According to this law, any facility—excluding hospitals and critical access hospitals—that bills Medicare for CT, MRI, PET, or nuclear medicine services must obtain accreditation from a CMS-approved accrediting organization to be eligible for Medicare reimbursement. This ensures that advanced diagnostic imaging services meet consistent standards for clinical quality, radiation safety, equipment performance, and personnel qualifications. 

Currently, CMS approves four accrediting organizations to evaluate and certify facilities: 

  • American College of Radiology (ACR)
  • The Joint Commission (TJC)
  • Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC)
  • RadSite

Accrediting Organizations

Choosing the right accreditor depends on a facility’s size, service mix, budget, and operational goals. Below is a comparison of these organizations and a summary of the shared accreditation requirements they enforce.

CMS-Approved Accrediting Organizations Comparison

Accrediting Body

Pros

Cons

American College of Radiology (ACR)

- Radiology-specific expertise
- Widely recognized
- Detailed clinical evaluation
including phantom evaluations

- Paperwork-heavy
- Longer review times

The Joint Commission (TJC)

- Can align with hospital accreditation
- Strong safety & process focus
- On-site evaluations

- Costlier for outpatient centers
- Less imaging-specific focus

Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC)

- Strong clinical protocols
- Peer-reviewed process
- User-friendly portal

- Better known for Cardiac and Vascular imaging
- Smaller institutional reach

RadSite

- Fast & cost-effective
- Good for outpatient/mobile sites
- Streamlined online process

- Less clinical depth
- Lower brand recognition in hospitals

Shared MIPPA Accreditation Criteria (Required by all four accrediting bodies)

Category

Requirement

Personnel Qualifications

Board-certified physicians and credentialed technologists (e.g., ARRT, NMTCB)

Equipment Performance

Routine QC testing; documentation of maintenance and upgrades

Image Quality

Review of QC measures or Sample image submissions evaluated for resolution, artifacts, and protocol adherence.

Radiation Safety

Dose optimization protocols; dose monitoring for CT/NM

Quality Assurance

Written QA/QI plan; peer review; error tracking and process improvement

Policies & Procedures

Exam protocols, emergency policies, appropriateness criteria

Administrative Oversight

HIPAA, infection control, documentation audits, compliance reviews

Best Accrediting Organization by Facility Type

Facility Type

Best Accrediting Organization

Why It’s a Good Fit

Considerations

Hospitals / Health Systems

The Joint Commission (TJC)

- Aligns with existing hospital accreditation
- Comprehensive evaluations
- Integrated safety programs

- Higher cost
- Less imaging-specific detail

Outpatient Imaging Clinics

American College of Radiology (ACR)

- High credibility and recognition
- Modality-specific standards

 

- Documentation-heavy
- Longer review timeline

Cardiology & Vascular Clinics

Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC)

- Cardiac imaging expertise
- Peer-reviewed process

 

- Limited brand recognition outside cardiac and vascular imaging
- Less presence in large hospitals

Budget-Conscious Providers

RadSite

- Cost-effective
- Streamlined online process
- Quick turnaround

- Less peer review
- Lower visibility in hospital settings

Making the Right Choice

Choosing the right accrediting organization under MIPPA is not a one-size-fits-all decision—it should reflect your facility’s clinical focus, operational structure, and long-term goals. Whether you are part of a large hospital network, an independent outpatient clinic, or a specialized cardiology practice, accreditation plays a vital role in demonstrating your commitment to patient safety, image quality, and regulatory compliance. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each CMS-approved accreditor, facilities can make informed decisions that not only meet federal requirements but also support continuous improvement and excellence in diagnostic imaging services. 

LANDAUER Medical Physics accreditation experts—adept in all modalities—can support your application to the American College of Radiology (ACR), Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC), or RadSite. If your program is seeking accreditation by The Joint Commission (TJC) or DNV, we provide all supporting physics services. 

Looking for more guidance?

Contact LANDAUER today to learn more about how our credentialed medical physicists can help support your application process.